Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christine Stump's avatar

What a trenchant, systems perspective analysis of this phenomenon, thank you. I propose one refinement, probably a semantic change, but one I personally have found illuminating. It's not that people didn't "pay" (support, renumerate) for these services in the past: it's that the exchange was embedded in the structure of the community. Capitalism and tech have democratized community, but also turned the support and exchange structures into "money," in many ways making the exchange appear simpler than it is. "Women's" work is a good example of this. In a system where a family is a unit focused on the thriving of each of its members, care, nursing, gardening, and emotional labor can be (obviously, it isn't always) embedded in the structure of give-and-take and the flow of resources. Reducing that structure to mechanistic parts, disassembling those gears and connectors - so that they can be set up in many different ways, for many different desire/need combos - can rupture the very embeddedness that CAN (again, doesn't always) create flow of resources to those who are using them for the growth of the system. I think of Shamans here, too. Historically, they did enjoy a caretaking relationship with their communities - often with a great deal of space from the mundane routines, to facilitate their deep work, while being acknowledged as elders, leaders, healers, and valued parts of the community. Whether through barter, community stores, or other means, their work was supported. The current economic model of valuing support, healing, and leadership demands that we become very specific about how WE (as healers, coaches, supporters) want the gears and connectors (food, housing, transportation, joy, sharing....) to be constructed in OUR lives. That same specificity can/does apply to becoming clear on who we deem our community to be, who we are deeply connected with.

Chris - DeStress Your Mind's avatar

Hi George ,

Such a thought provoking post.

It’s funny how money and position ourselves or the service / product offered is so challenging.

A lot of can have its roots in ourselves and how comfortable we are with ourselves and accepting not everyone will like us or the way we talk about our service or products (digital or otherwise).

I’m still learning to speak authentically about my service(s) and be consistent in that message without trying to fit in with what people want to hear (people pleasing) - there are many analogies I could mention here, yet I’ll keep this message to the point instead..

This is an internal shift and growth for me.

As for pricing.. always a challenge.

Do you have a variable pricing that sways with the current financial climate (not too drastic in price changes) or keep the prices fixed or higher and ensure the market language is effective enough to show the value and solution that such an investment would offer the client.?

(I suppose that is down to the value I perceive of myself.. (which is ultimately infinite))?

These are one of the many challenges for the soulpreneur I think and feel.

Thank you for shaking the tree of possibilities George 🙂🙏🏼.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?